What Did Michael Vick Actually Do To These Dogs?

yoyoyo23 asked:


Hi I am here to speak about the Michael Vick case of dog fighting. I understand why he has been sentenced to 23 months in prison and all, but what exactly did he do that makes people **** him so much now? I know that he funded a illegal dog fighting operation but is that it? Did he torchure the dogs or something? Or straight up just killed them with his bare hands? I just don’t understand the specific details on what he did except fund the operation. Specifically, what did he do to the dogs himself?

12 Comments

holehearted85July 28th, 2009 at 9:05 pm

He would have the dogs fight and if they didnt fight well, he would hang them or drown them.. And Lord knows what else he did.. But this was all I had heard.. 23 months wasnt a long enough sentence for what he did..

EDIT: I didnt know he smashed them into the pavement and electricuted them.. If you ask me, he deserves LIFE without the possiblitity of parole.. Because I bet he will do it again when he gets out.. He lied about his apology.. What else has he lied about just to make himself look good? He’s a murderer! He took away innocent lives of living creaters.. That to me is a murderer..

alexisJuly 31st, 2009 at 6:13 pm

drowned them. if they lost a fight. Also electrocuted some of the dogs

islandwahine2uAugust 3rd, 2009 at 5:58 pm

I agree with the comment that 23 months is nothing on what he should have recieved. People who use animals to fight for entertainment just makes me nautious.

StarkAugust 4th, 2009 at 3:23 am

Well he was involved with dog fighting, which, in itself is Terrible. But He has also been linked to cruel executions of the dogs. Including, but not limited to, Tying dogs up and letting other dogs chew them up. Drowning dogs, Smashing them into the pavement until they died, and electrocuting them to death.

*I agree he deserves much worse than what he got. He got off EASY for what he did.

Red RoverAugust 7th, 2009 at 10:15 am

Other than being involved/funding dog fights? He electrocuted some, beat others… drowned them… broke their arms. The works. The madman pleaded guilty to charges…. He’s just a bad guy who did bad things to good dogs.

JoAugust 7th, 2009 at 9:21 pm

I wonder how many Jews ****** killed with his own hands? I wonder why Charles Manson was given the death penalty (and then escaped it as Ca. did away with it while he was on death row) in spite of the fact that he SENT OTHERS to do his dirty work?
Michael Vick OWNED the dogs and FOUGHT THEM or had them fight. Whether he personally drowned, electrocuted, beat or stood by to watch is not the issue.

amandaAugust 8th, 2009 at 3:55 am

I like dogs more than people so michael vick pretty much deserves to be beaten/eaten/ and electrocuted to death imho! & to the previous commenter, this is about dogs not jews…

ILY34August 11th, 2009 at 1:23 am

Excuse me, did you just say *wat else did he do but fund an illegal dog fighting corporation*? How would you feel is someone funded a corporation to have you and another person fight for entertainment? Pretty sure you wouldnt appreciate it. This is a huge deal and i think its horrible that you could even think about that man w/o getting chills down your spine

Stephanie Loves SamAugust 13th, 2009 at 7:35 pm

lets see he hanged the dogs, drowned them, electrocuited them, smashing them into the pavement, need i go on. he should have been in jail for the maximum amount of time instead of 23 months. thats like giving a child a detention and sending him back to his class for fighting with and hurting another student

Flip19533August 16th, 2009 at 10:44 am

he admited to killing some of the dogs by Shooting, Electric Shock, and slamming their heads into the floor repeatedly, oh and hanging.

Agility ManAugust 17th, 2009 at 10:10 am

Well, separate from a series of illegal activities like: dog-fighting, gambling, tolerating drug-use and sales at these fights, tax evasion, here are some of the things he did to the dogs he had that I find offensive:

1. Used other dogs (typically smaller dogs) as “bait” to help teach his fighters blood lust. Typically this involves throwing a much smaller dog into a kennel with no ability to escape and after the “dog in training” has either been shocked a few times or if it’s territorial, you put the “bait” in it’s space so it’s an intruder.

2. Killing dogs that didn’t “fight well.” And the methods of killing the dogs included: drowning the dogs, electrocuting them and also strangling them by hanging.

3. Badly treated all of his dogs. This is not a case of treating dogs royally until they lost a fight. This is an instance of an A-hole mistreating all of the dogs. And yes, that included torture (which is often a means of “training” a dog for dogfighting)..

chico bAugust 19th, 2009 at 8:38 am

He was charged and convicted for animal cruelty, what he did was very wrong…and did he get a just punishment, I think so..he was sentenced to two years and lostg about 100 million dollars. I think he should have received some special program to understand exactly what he was doing to these animals. What I dont understand is..there was supposedly a undercover agent involved…shouldnt there been a time when the dog head was slamming against the ground or the electricution being conducted, the FBI agent yelled ENOUGH..I guess he felt like he needed to build a really good case against the people. I think one organized dog fight was worth a least a yeear, so what in the hell was they waiting for?

Leave a comment

Your comment