Is Michael Vick worse than most meat eaters?

http://www.wrightlawnv.com asked:


Michael Vick did a terrible thing. He hung, drowned, tortured and forced dogs to fight.

Now, I ask you, how is that any worse than what our meat industry does to beef, pork, fowl, and fish?

As consumers of such “food”, are we not endorsing cruelty to animals?

8 Comments

Sugar PIeJune 25th, 2009 at 10:02 am

Livestock destined to be food is not hung, drowned, tortured, and forced to fight. The animals are humanely killed.

I see a WORLD of difference between me, a carnivore and dog-lover, and Vick, a greedy dog fighter.

MJJune 25th, 2009 at 3:28 pm

Michael Vick doesn’t deserve to be compared to butchers and hunters. Read your own question: we do not torture, hang, drown cows and pigs. What Vick did was cause beautiful animals excrutiating pain and fear. He is one of the worst peopleon this earth.

danman9888June 28th, 2009 at 7:38 pm

no, ur right, we should let VIck go…

and cows would be extinct if we didn’t eat them

jautomaticJune 30th, 2009 at 4:31 am

you don’t have to buy factory farmed meat. You can buy humanely killed animals. I don’t think any dog fighting could be seen as humane.

gallagher.ellenJuly 1st, 2009 at 4:33 am

stop trying to be an “intellectual”.

you are an idiot

BingaleeJuly 2nd, 2009 at 7:46 am

You weirdo wanker you! Get back to your cage & stop bothering respectable people. Ten to one on you’re a PESTA person.

♥candycane♥July 3rd, 2009 at 12:02 am

YES AND I HOPE HE ROTS IN HELL AND DEMONS EAT HIS INTESTINES, HEAD, EVERYTHING BCUZ HE IS A BASSTARD AND I **** HIM AND HE’S A JERK AND I **** HATE **** HIM. I CAN’T IMAGINE SOMEONE TORTURING ANIMALS LIKE THAT. WHO IS THAT HEARTLESS???

RobinLuJuly 4th, 2009 at 8:43 pm

Killing an animal for consumption is completely different from torturing an animal just to get your rocks off. I can’t believe that you aren’t intelligent enough to figure THAT one out!

Leave a comment

Your comment